Logo

“Its Netaji Subhas not Gandhi Satyagraha brought freedom to India” – Dr B. R. Ambedkar

“Its Netaji Subhas not Gandhi Satyagraha brought freedom to India” – Dr B. R. Ambedkar

“Its Netaji Subhas not Gandhi Satyagraha brought freedom to India” – Dr B. R. Ambedkar
Only Dr. B. R. Ambedkar announced and cordially accepted Netaji Subash contribution. Please do not misunderstand Dr. B.R. Amberkar. Dr. Amberkar was a real educated and social Engineers during independent time. It is total conspiracy of Congress to suppress and mislead to India about Dr. B. R Amberkar. Dr. Ambedkar is the one of the Vitim of Congress politics like Dr. S. P. Mukherjee, Netaji Subash chandra bose, Pandit Dindalay Upadhay , Lal Bahadur Shastri, Sahid Bhagat singh many others

Secular, Federal, Socialist

On 15 November 1948 at the Constituent Assembly debate in Parliament, a member, Prof K.T Shah from Bihar moved an Amendment to the original Preamble statement. He insisted that the words, “Secular, Federal, Socialist” be inserted into the statement. In a detailed reply, BR Ambedkar justified why he did not include the words “secular” and “socialist” in the Preamble:
Sir, I regret that I cannot accept the amendment of Prof. K. T. Shah. My objections, stated briefly are two. In the first place the Constitution, as I stated in my opening speech in support of the motion I made before the House, is merely a mechanism for the purpose of regulating the work of the various organs of the State. It
is not a mechanism where by particular members or particular parties are installed in office. What should be the policy of the State, how the Society should beorganised in its social and economic side are matters which must be decided by the people themselves according to time and circumstances. It cannot be laiddown in the Constitution itself, because that is destroying democracy altogether. If you state in the Constitution that the social organisation of the State shall takea particular form, you are, in my judgment, taking away the liberty of the people to decide what should be the social organisation in which they wish to live. It is perfectly possible today, for the majority people to hold that the socialist organisation of society is better than the capitalist organisation of society. But itwould be perfectly possible for thinking people to devise some other form of social organisation which might be better than the socialist organisation of today or of
tomorrow. I do not see therefore why the Constitution should tie down the people to live in a particular form and not leave it to the people themselves to decide itfor themselves. This is one reason why the amendment should be
opposed.Then Ambedkar remarked, “The second reason is that the amendment is purely superfluous.” B R Ambedkar.

Since in 1980 SC judgement it declared 2provisions of 42nd amendment as unconstitutional so GOI can amend those
including the preamble back to the visionary words of Dr. Ambedkar. Dr. Ambedkar was a patriot & dharmic who took care of national interests even while converting to Dharmic sub religion of Buddhism instead of alien religions like Christianity or Islam whom he called as anti-national & dangerous for India. His views opposing article 370 are so logical. Its a shame that worst PM in world’s history Nehru didn’t allow the victory of Baba Saheb in elections. Had it happened he would have been able to work more effectively for India, Dalits & maybe even have not converted. He was an optimist & great thinker, its a shame he was let down by his contemporary society

Facebook Comments
<



Related Articles

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can be first to comment this post!

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*