Logo

Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

If you read closely and historically , you will be as amazed as I am as how Bhagvatgita, a Hindu scripture of >35000 years old already know about Atom and molecule..Not only that  ancient Indians knew about indivisible part of atom, long before Dalton,who proposed a theory of Indivisibility of Atom, during 1808.Rutherford proved that the atoms consist of one more particle, whom he named Proton because it was positively charged  1911, . During 1932, James Chadwick proved the presence of a Neutron in the atom. Because it had no charge, it was named as Neutron.

atomic-theory-of-bhagvat-gita

 Let us look at Bhagvat puran which  describes atom as Paramanu and each Anu (molecule) consisting of at least two Paramanu.

caramaH sad-visheShANAm aneko .asaMyutaH sadA |
paramANuH sa viGYeyo nR^iNAm aikya bhramo yataH || 3.11.1

The material manifestation’s ultimate particle, which is indivisible and not formed into a body, is called the atom. It exists always as an invisible identity, even after the dissolution of all forms. The material body is but a combination of such atoms, but it is misunderstood by the common man.

sata eva padArthasya svarUpAvasthitasya yat |
kaivalyaM parama-mahAn avisheSho nirantaraH | |3.11.2

<

Atoms are the ultimate state of the manifest universe. When they stay in their own forms without forming different bodies, they are called the unlimited oneness. There are certainly different bodies in physical forms, but the atoms themselves form the complete manifestation.

The Parama-Mahan is still more subtler than Paramanu.
The Parama Mahan is unique, has no difference, no spacing and leaves behind nothing.
However, majority of Hydrogen atoms have only electrons and protons, but no neutrons.

evaM kAlo .apy anumitaH saukShmye sthaulye ca sattama |
saMsthAna-bhuktyA bhagavAn avyakto vyakta-bhug vibhuH || 3.11.3

In the same way time also has its discrete divisions, which comprise its gross form and this can be measured by the movement and combination of particles; viShNu is that which is unmanifest, existing in movement and in potential.

sa kAlaH paramANur vai yo bhu~nkte paramANutAm |
sato .avisheSha-bhug yas tu sa kAlaH paramo mahAn || 3.11.4

Those discrete units of time, which are verily further indivisible, correspond to the time required by a paramANu to cover the space equivalent to a paramANu; this is verily the primal, supreme time.

aNur dvau paramANU syAt trasareNus trayaH smRtaH |
jAlArka-rashmy-avagataH kham evAnupatan agAt || 3.11.5

Two paramANus are combine to form an aNu, and 3 combine to form a trasareNu; the rays of light emerging from a mesh can make these [trasareNus] move up in empty space.

Bhagavata states that the Paramanus never join each other, only by coming close together they produce an illusion of a solid matter, which has specific properties. It is now accepted by the science that an atom of an element has some specific properties but its Subatomic particles have no such properties.
Its is now proved by the science that the subatomic particles are not really joined to each other, they are far away from each other. Proton of an atom is at a distance of 40,000 [forty thousand] times the diameter of it from its Electron.

Bhagavata Purana has correlated the matter with the time, just like the space-time continuam of the modern science. Time is unmanifested (Avyakta), but it enjoys the manifest world (Vyaktabhuk). It comes into existence in a special way, so it is called as ‘ Vibhu’. The finest unit of time is named as Paramanu, which equals to a millionth of a second. To be precise, a Paramanu of time is 0.000032 seconds, according to the Bhagavata.
The theory of the Paramanus proposed by the Bhagavata is now accepted by the modern science, but the ‘Parama Mahan’ is not yet accepted by the science. A Paramanu keeps behind some ‘thing’, if broken ; but the Parama Mahan will not keep any ‘thing’ behind, except itself. That Unique thing is called as ‘Kaivalya’ (nirvana/salvation/moksha), which is the unique, ultimate Reality.

Vishnu Sahasranama (written in the Shanti Parva of the Mahabharata) gives the meaning of Vishnu as : Veveshti Vyaapnoti iti Vishnuh – That which pervades everywhere is Vishnu.
It is known that atoms don’t exist independently and they exist as molecules, which are spread everywhere to make up the matter appear in different shapes and forms.

Siva is described in Tantra books as the one who is in Anu-Poorva sthiti (pre-atomic stage).
In pre-atomic stage, an unstable atom has an excess electron or proton and this means, Siva exists in the form of atomic energy which flows, and these atoms makeup molecules, which ultimately appears like matter.
This clearly explains the line ‘Sivaya Vishnu Roopaya, Siva Roopaya Vishnave | Sivascha hridayam Vishnor, Vishnascha hridayam Sivaha ||’

Ancient literature like Lakshmi Tantra also suggests that Paramatma, the Supersoul in the heart of everyone through whom all Avatars come to material universe, is lying on that Milk ocean (Milky Way/Galaxy). So Paramatma is in every atom and heart of all souls in 8400000 kinds(species) of material bodies, with two souls in each heart calledjivaatma and Paramatma.

Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

Facebook Comments


Tags assigned to this article:
Atomic theory from Bhagvatgita

Related Articles

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Tom
    Tom 5 November, 2017, 02:11

    Thank You for your article and translation of some of that text. What is being described there is an atomist theory, and theirs is a very good description of ultimate reality of the physical universe along those logical lines. Very similar in style to my theory at atomisttheory2016.net, however it is as there (the ancients) a very general, not specific explanation. Many ancients had some similar theories, if the library at Alexandria had never been burned we might know of many more. It has definite similarities to modern physics theory, but I dont think as much as you suppose on the specifics, because they are of a different style, and indeed SOME of modern physics has lost its logic, and I feel will be found to be incorrect. I was most interested in the description of time as related to the movement of the ultimate particle through a space equal to its length. Wow, I have never seen that elsewhere, but is exactly what I do in my hypothesis. But I do not consider it a indivisible unit of time, just a convenient measure of time. What I have never come across, and which puzzles me as it is very simple logic which the ancients could have I would think thought of, is my idea of the need for collisions of ultimate particles to be in balance in order to transfer linear motion, as described in my first chapter, which in itself then limits what shape these particles could have.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*